The Swarm

December 12, 2008

'If You’re Admitting The Criticism Is Unimportant And Misaimed, What Then Is The Intent?': The Clipse Call Out Pitchfork...

TDS Editors

from The Clipse blog

Hiphop from its genesis was a meritocracy—a bunch of dudes lined up in a sweatbox trying to outshine the next man. Their aim wasn’t MTV rotation or club spins; it was renown around their hoods. While the technology has improved and the production has gotten more sophisticated, we still approach our music with that same purity. We rap about things we’ve done and seen, and we aim to tell the story in a unique and intriguing way. Our critical success and uncommonly loyal fanbase stand as evidence. We don’t count any perceived lack of club visibility as a shortcoming. In fact, it’s a source of pride, that we’ve managed to endure over a decade without pandering, without compromising, without deviating from our signature sound.

It’s very hard to swallow a review wherein the author slams the album for a full paragraph, but then backs off, saying ‘I’m mostly just quibbling here.’ Well, if you’re admitting the criticism is unimportant and misaimed, what then is the intent? The Clipse have smashed the mixtape circuit for years with the untouchable We Got it 4 Cheap series. That’s indisputable. And the Clipse are gonna come with it like nobody’s ever heard with our ’09 official studio release, Till the Casket Drops. As a major label release, it’ll have the energy and polish to merit full-bore scrutiny. We invite Tom Breihan and anyone else to focus that critical gaze on it; we’re certain it’ll shine. And by the way, that snide remark about Play Cloths; unless everyone who’s seen, bought, and fawned over the line is lying to us, we seem to have a fashion staple in the works. We’ll take that kind of unilateral reception any day, with (dis)respect to Breihan’s flawed fashion sense. Stick to music, Tom. Well, maybe not our music.

The original Pitchfork review

Again, I’m mostly just quibbling here. This is a quickie mixtape intended to celebrate the launch of Clipse’s new clothing line Play Cloths, which is unfortunately saddled with both one of the worst names and worst logos in rapper-clothing-line history. As a quickie mixtape, it beats the everliving fuck out of virtually all its mixhut competition. A lot of this stuff was probably recorded on a tight schedule, relatively tossed-off. But nothing these guys did used to sound tossed-off. And maybe by the time they release their next album (next year, lord willin’), Clipse should look beyond the corner and make a few tracks that don’t revolve around white powder. Like, for instance, maybe some girl songs. Just a thought.


Post a comment

Previous comments include

#1 mreasy says:

It's weird they bothered with this rebuttal - it's actually a thoughtful, well-written, and overall entirely positive review...not to mention it was the lead review and it's a promo mix tape. I'm a huge Pitchfork detractor most of the time, but this review was one of their less idiotic moments.

#2 lalalala says:

haha at first i thought that said white power and was wondering why a major label would want to release something like that. makes more sense after the 2nd read. being a musician, i know that critics exist and every musician should just get used to it. take good and bad reviews with a grain of salt. i mean, it's just music.

www.purevolume.com/arden free download!

#3 thirteenburn says:

If it smells like shit, tastes like shit and above all, sounds like shit, well, then it's shit and shit is as shit does.

As to the question Mr.Easy puts out there, it's simple - they need as much pub as they can get, because contrary to "popular" belief and what this mag tries to claim, Clips AREN'T all that relevent nor talented. Nothing that hasn't been done before, ad nauseum, "untouchable" or not.

"Make the world a better place and punch an "indie" band member in the face...repeatedly."

#4 2RealEstateMidgets says:

"As to the question Mr. Easy puts out there, it's simple - they need as much pub as they can get, because contrary to "popular" belief and what this mag tries to claim, Clips AREN'T all that relevant nor talented. Nothing that hasn't been done before, ad nauseam, "untouchable" or not."

If you're looking for anything in popular music that hasn't been done before - especially in rap or hip-hop - you're dumb as the stump from which your wooden criticisms (about music criticism, no less!) were carved. Blaming a band for looking for publicity is a little like blaming a compass for pointing north - but then again, you're just full of all kinds of obviousness today, aren't you, big nuts!

"Make the world a better place and punch thirteenburn in the face...repeatedly."

#5 what a says:

bitch.

#6 frank says:

I think the thoughtful, well-articulated comments by The Clipse on their blog only serve to validate the one of the main points of the Pitchfork review: that Clipse is capable of so much more than limiting their lyrics to dealing cocaine . . .

#7 E Dizz says:

Clipse kill it on their new mix tape - been my top choice since they came on the scene.

Pitchfork = TMZ for indie shitheads.

#8 kate says:

Pitchfork's reviews hardly ever correspond with their number rankings. I think the rankings are actually a collective score, whereas only one person works on a review. That's problematic. And Clipse are right to point out the contradiction: how does someone who admits--in the course of a review they presumably wrote because the material was worth taking seriously enough to spend words on--to "quibbling" dare to call someone else's work "tossed-off?" That is low quality shit.

#9 wheatus says:

Music critics are cunt ass wannabes who couldn't shit on a mic if they had dysentery.


Click Here